Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980

Jennewein v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF WILMINGTON

Jennewein v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF WILMINGTON
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided April 15, 1980 · Parker, Morris, Wells
264 S.E.2d 802; 46 N.C. App. 324; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2800 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Jennewein v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF WILMINGTON

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

The order from which both petitioners and respondents have attempted to appeal is interlocutory. An appeal does not lie from an interlocutory order unless it affects some substantial right of the appellant and will work an injury to him if not corrected before an appeal from the final judgment. Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co., 296 N.C. 486, 251 S.E. 2d 443 (1979); Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377 (1950); Leak v. Covington, 95 N.C. 193 (1886); Auction Co. v. Myers, 40 N.C. App. 570, 253 S.E. 2d 362 (1979). The order in the present case remanded the case to the city council for hearing de novo. It did not affect a substantial right of either party which cannot be corrected upon appeal from final judgment without either party suffering injury in the meantime.

The attempted appeals are premature and are

Dismissed.

Chief Judge MORRIS and Judge WELLS concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.