Jennewein v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF WILMINGTON
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Transportation (N.C. Ct. App. 2010)
- Middle Sound Lookout v. New Hanover Cnty. (N.C. Ct. App. 2026)
- Coates v. Durham Cty. (N.C. Ct. App. 2019)
- Akers v. City of Mount Airy (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)
- Heritage Pointe Builders, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board of General Contractors (N.C. Ct. App. 1995)
- HIGH BIDGE HINKLE JT. VENT. v. Albuquerque (N.M. Ct. App. 1994)
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque (N.M. Ct. App. 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The order from which both petitioners and respondents have attempted to appeal is interlocutory. An appeal does not lie from an interlocutory order unless it affects some substantial right of the appellant and will work an injury to him if not corrected before an appeal from the final judgment. Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co., 296 N.C. 486, 251 S.E. 2d 443 (1979); Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377 (1950); Leak v. Covington, 95 N.C. 193 (1886); Auction Co. v. Myers, 40 N.C. App. 570, 253 S.E. 2d 362 (1979). The order in the present case remanded the case to the city council for hearing de novo. It did not affect a substantial right of either party which cannot be corrected upon appeal from final judgment without either party suffering injury in the meantime.
The attempted appeals are premature and are
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.