Lloyd v. Carnation Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Lloyd v. Carnation Co., 47 N.C. App. 203 (1980)
266 S.E.2d 722; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003
Arnold, Hill, Martin, Robert
Lloyd v. Carnation Co.
Opinion of the Court
Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).
For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is
Dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- BEN LLOYD v. CARNATION COMPANY, GARY WILLIER, and WARREN MANUEL
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published