Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Lloyd v. Carnation Co., 47 N.C. App. 203 (1980)
266 S.E.2d 722; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003
Arnold, Hill, Martin, Robert

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
BEN LLOYD v. CARNATION COMPANY, GARY WILLIER, and WARREN MANUEL
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published