Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided June 3, 1980 · Arnold, Hill, Martin, Robert
47 N.C. App. 203; 266 S.E.2d 722; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.