Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982

R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour

R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided November 16, 1982 · Martin, Hedrick, Hill
296 S.E.2d 822; 59 N.C. App. 537; 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 3149 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour

Opinion

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Defendants have appealed from an order setting aside a judgment and granting a new trial under Rule 60(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. The order entered pursuant to Rule 60(b), setting aside the judgment, is interlocutory and the appeal is premature. Similar to a grant of a 60(b) motion to set aside a default judgment, this order is not appealable as “it does not finally dispose of the case and requires further action by the trial court.” See Shaw v. Pedersen, 53 N.C. App. 796, 798, 281 S.E. 2d 700, 701 (1981), quoting Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 209, 270 S.E. 2d 431, 434 (1980).

Defendants have adequately preserved the question of the appropriateness of the trial court’s order setting aside the judg *539 ment and granting a new trial. That question may be raised, if necessary, upon an appeal from the final judgment following the retrial of plaintiffs original claim on its merits. Accordingly, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Hedrick and Hill concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.