Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016

Kirkman v. N.C. Dep't of Commerce

Kirkman v. N.C. Dep't of Commerce
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Decided May 17, 2016 · Hunter, Robert
788 S.E.2d 681; 2016 WL 2865087; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 559 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Kirkman v. N.C. Dep't of Commerce

Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge.

Generally, "the denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order from which there may not be an immediate appeal ." Multiple Claimants v. N.C. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 176 N.C.App. 278, 282, 626 S.E.2d 666, 669 (2006). N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1-277(b) provides for immediate appeal from an adverse ruling as to the jurisdiction of the trial court, but the statute does not allow appellants to challenge sufficiency of process and service. Howard v. Ocean Trail Convalescent Ctr., 68 N.C.App. 494, 496, 315 S.E.2d 97, 99 (1984) (citing Love v. Moore, 305 N.C. 575, 291 S.E.2d 141 (1982) ). Here, Respondent appeals from an order denying Respondent's motion to dismiss, and concluding service of process was proper. We dismiss Respondent's appeal as interlocutory.

DISMISSED.

Judges CALABRIA and TYSON concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.