Schilling v. Saul

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Schilling v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION Civ. No. 7:16-cv-00123-D BETHANY LANEY SCHILLING, ) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) Plaintiffs counsel filed a motion for approval of attorney’s fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b), in the amount of $41,246.00. Attorney’s fees under

_ section 206(b) are paid from past-due benefits awarded to a successful claimant.

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b). Plaintiff has previously been awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA),

28 U.S.C. § 2412

, in the amount of $4,881.25 (ECF No. 28). Defendant filed a response, stating that under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

535 U.S. 789

(2002), it is the duty of the Court to determine a reasonable fee. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs counsel be awarded fees under

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b) in the amount of $ 35,006 , and refund to Plaintiff the smaller award between this amount and the EAJA award. SO ORDERED, this 22 day of October, 2019.

United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown