District Court, W.D. North Carolina, 2019

CS Technology, Inc. v. Horizon River Technologies, LLC

CS Technology, Inc. v. Horizon River Technologies, LLC
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Decided August 8, 2019
CS Technology, Inc. v. Horizon River Technologies, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00273-RJC-DSC CS TECHNOLOGY INC. AND ) SITEHANDS INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) HORIZON RIVER TECHNOLOGIES, ) LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on “Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count V” (document #72), “[Defendant-]Counterclaim Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Counterclaim” (document # 77) and the parties’ briefs and exhibits.

The Fourth Circuit has held that leave to amend a pleading should be granted unless (1) “the amendment would be prejudicial to the opposing party,” (2) “the moving party has acted in bad faith,” or (3) “the amendment would be futile.” Equal Rights Ctr. v. Niles Bolton Assocs., 602 F.3d 597, 603 (4th Cir. 2010). Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants oppose the Motion arguing that Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s proposed amendment is prejudicial, futile and offered in bad faith.

For the reasons stated in Counterclaim Plaintiff’s briefs, its “Second Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Counterclaim” (document # 77) is GRANTED. Counterclaim Plaintiff shall file its Amended and Supplemental Counterclaim within five days of this Order.

It is well settled that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F. 3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (amended pleading renders original pleading of no effect); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motion to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).

IT IS THEREFORE FURTHER ORDERED that “Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count V” (document #72) is administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties, including but not limited to moving counsel, and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr. SO ORDERED.

Signed: August 8, 2019 fr4c ey David S. Cayer : United States Magistrate Judge ae

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.