Russell v. Lake Arbor 80M TIC, LLC

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Russell v. Lake Arbor 80M TIC, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:19-cv-338-MOC-DSC

SERITA RUSEELL and DORETHA ) JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves and others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) LAKE ARBOR 80M TIC, LLC, d/b/a ) LAKE ARBOR APARTMENTS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand to State Court, (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiffs contend that the jurisdictional amount of more than $5 million has not been met for Defendants to remove this class action lawsuit. See

28 U.S.C. § 1332

(d). After conducting jurisdictional discovery, Defendants now consent to remand, conceding that the jurisdictional amount has not been met. See (Doc. No. 28, Notice of Consent to Motion to Remand). Therefore, the Court will remand this action to state court. Plaintiffs request an award of costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred as the result of the removal pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1447

(c). The Court in its discretion declines to do so here, as Defendants possessed an objectively reasonable basis for seeking removal. See Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.,

546 U.S. 132, 141

(2005) (“[W]hen an objectively reasonable basis exists, fees should be denied.”). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand to State Court, (Doc. No. 13), is GRANTED and this matter is remanded to state court. The parties shall each pay their own attorney fees and costs.

Signed: December 20, 2019

oit-eaxcaoe Max O. Cogburn i & United States District Judge Felgen

Reference

Status
Unknown