Ortiz v. Saul
Ortiz v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION No. 4:19-CV-109-FL MARBELLY ORTIZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. Plaintiffs counsel consented to the defendant’s Motion for Remand. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,
501 U.S. 89(1991). SO ORDERED this _ 18th gay of _ March , 2020. (Mee AS. Llerager Judge Louise W. Flanagan United States District Court
Reference
- Status
- Unknown