District Court, W.D. North Carolina, 2020

Miller v. Berryhill

Miller v. Berryhill
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Decided February 27, 2020
Miller v. Berryhill

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION

Troy O. Miller, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00060-FDW-DSC ) Andrew Saul, ) CONSENT ORDER Commissioner Of ) Social Security, ) Defendant. )

This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order, and it appearing that the parties have agreed that Plaintiff Troy O. Miller be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,590.00 in full and final settlement of attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), these EAJA fees are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party, and are subject to offset through the Treasury Department’s Offset Program to satisfy any pre-existing debt Plaintiff may owe to the Federal Government. If, subsequent to entry of the Consent Order, the Commissioner determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government that would subject this award of attorney fees to offset, the Commissioner may honor Plaintiff’s signed assignment of EAJA fees providing for payment of the subject fees to Plaintiff’s Counsel, rather than to Plaintiff. If such a debt is present, then any remaining fee after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s Counsel.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner pay the sum of $3,590.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Signed: February 27, 2020 David S. Cayer : i-f United States Magistrate Judge ae

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.