Grindstaff v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION RANDY GRINDSTAFF, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil No. 1:19-CV-287-FDW ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11).
Defendant, Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, has moved this Court, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment reversing his decision with a remand of the case for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff's attorney does not oppose Defendant’s motion for remand.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED the Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 3, 2020 Frank D. Whitney é & yf
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.