IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:08-cv-176-BO WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., ) Plaintiff, V. ORDER TOWN OF CARY, NC, ef al., Defendants. _ )

This matter is before the Court on motions by William Scott Davis Jr., pro se, filed pursuant to Rule 60, 17, 52, and 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Davis seeks to reopen the case, appeal, and amend the findings of the Court. Davis contends that (1) the respondents fraudulently concealed a conspiracy of the Wake County District Attorney’s Office, (2) that a state criminal proceeding against Davis involved illegal searches and seizures, (3) that there was a conspiracy to illegally manufacture and fraudulently fabricate criminal domestic violence malicious prosecution evidence, (4) that the respondent fraudulently concealed malicious use and abuse of process, (5) that respondents fraudulently concealed that state attorneys conspired to illegally manufacture and fraudulently fabricate evidence, and (6) that the UNC School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry via sham, ruse, and farce illegally conducted an unauthorized forensic evaluation. This case has each been dismissed, judgment has been entered, appeals have been taken, and mandates have issued. Davis’ current motions, which are at best difficult to decipher, does not appear to provide the Court with any basis upon which to reopen these: matters or provide Davis with any relief from judgment. Moreover, a pre-filing injunction has been entered against Davis. See Davis y. Mitchell, 5:12-CV-493-F (E.D.N.C. March 3, 2014). Insofar as Davis is attempting

to use the instant motion in these closed cases as a method by which to avoid the pre-filing injunction,! the Court will not sanction such action. Accordingly, the motions to reopen the case, appeal, and amend the findings of the Court are DENIED. [DE 90, 92, 93].

SO ORDERED, this 2 ( day of January, 2021.

I“ W. BOYLE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

| A pre-filing injunction has also been issued against Mr. Davis in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Davis v. Town of Cary North Carolina, No. 16-1377,

(4th Cir. Apr. 19, 2017), and the Eastern District of Virginia, Davis v. Jawaorski, No. 4:13-CV-63 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2013).