Benson v. Pender County Sheriffs Office
Benson v. Pender County Sheriffs Office
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION . No. 7:21-CV-16-D
STANLEY BRUCE BENSON, ) Plaintiff, v. ; ORDER PENDER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, ; and SHERIFF ALAN W. CUTLER, ) Defendants.
The court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss [D.E. 12] and DISMISSES the Pender ‘County Sheriff’ s Office as a defendant. See White v. Vance Cnty., No. 5:19-CV-467-BO,
2020 WL 943893, at *2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2020) (unpublished); Landry v. North Carolina, No. 3:10-cv-585- RJC-DCK,
2011 WL 3682788, at *2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2011) (unpublished); Vaught v. Ingram, No. 5:10-CT-3009-FL,
2011 WL 761482, at *4 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2011) (unpublished); Cooper v. Brunswick Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 7:10-CV-14-D,
2011 WL 736670, at *1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011) (unpublished); Parker v. Bladen Cnty.,
583 F. Supp. 2d 736,.740 (E.D.N.C. 2008); Hughes v. Bedsole,
913 F. Supp. 420, 426(E.D.N.C. 1994), aff'd,
48 F.3d 1376(4th Cir. 1995). The court DENIES as futile plaintiffs motion to amend to add Pender County as a defendant [D.E. 14]. In light of plaintiff’s allegations, Pender County is not a proper defendant in this action. Young v. Bailey,
368 N.C. 665, 669-70,
781 S.E.2d 277, 280(2016); McLaughlin v, Bailey,
240 N.C. App. 159, 160,
771 S.E.2d 570, 572 (2015), aff'd,
368 N.C. 618,
781 S.E.2d 23(2016); see White,
2020 WL 943893, at *3; Gentile v. Brunswick Cnty. Sheriff's Dep’t, No. 7:13-CV-81-FL,
2014 WL 1331159, at *15—16 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2014) (unpublished); Engleman v. Cumberland Cnty., No. 5:12-CV-147-FL,
2013 WL 157065, at *5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2013) (unpublished); Parker,
583 F. Supp. 2d at 739-40; Olvera v. Edmundson,
151 F. Supp. 2d 700, 705(W.D.N.C. 2001); Little v. Smith,
114 F. Supp. 2d 437, 445-46(W.D.N.C. 2000); Goodwin v. Furr,
25 F. Supp. 2d 713, _ 716-17 (M.D.N.C. 1998); Guy v. Jones,
747 F. Supp. 314, 317-19(E.D.N.C. 1990). Sheriff □□□□ W. Cutler is the sole defendant. In sum, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss [D.E. 12], DISMISSES the Pender County Sheriffs Office as a defendant, and DENIES as futile plaintiff's motion to amend to add Pender County as a defendant [D.E. 14]. SO ORDERED. This 20 day of May 2021.
United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown