Smith v. Saul
Smith v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION NO: 7:18-CV-00214-BO
TERR] ANTOINETTE SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER APPROVING 406(b) FEES v. ) ) ANDREW SAUL ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )
Plaintiff's counsel filed a motion for approval of attorney’s fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 406(b), seeking an attorney’s fee $22,059.88 from past due benefits of $88,236 payable to Plaintiff. Attorney’s fees under section 206(b) are paid from past-duc benefits awarded to a successful claimant,
42 U.S.C. §406(b). Counsel agrees that this requested fee will pay for all services at all levels. Plaintiff's counsel’s request therefore represents approval of attorney fees of 25% of total retroactive benefits. Under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,
535 U.S. 789,
122 S. Ct. 1817(2002), it is the duty of the Court to determine a reasonable fee. The Court, in Culbertson v. Berryiil!,
586 U.S. 304,
139 S. Ct. 517(2019), has endorsed the use of acontingency contract between the parties to allow up to a 25% fee of aggregate benefits for representation in Federal Court, providing that such a fee is reasonable. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsel be allowed fees under
42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of _/ 4 we? 00
— This thep of Yu , 2021.
TERRENCE W. BOYLE j UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Reference
- Status
- Unknown