District Court, E.D. North Carolina, 2021

Artis v. Kijakazi

Artis v. Kijakazi
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Decided September 7, 2021
Artis v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NO: 7:19-CV- 00071-BO

MICHAEL RENEE ARTIS, )

Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER APPROVING 406(b) FEES v. ) )

KILOLO KIJAKAZI ) )

Acting Commissioner of Social Security —_) )

Defendant. ) ao)

Plaintiff's counsel filed a motion for approval of attorney’s fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), seeking an attorney’s fee from past due benefits, $102,969 payable to Plaintiff and his family. The fee requested is $17,630.91. Attorney’s fees under section 206(b) are paid from past-due benefits awarded to a successful claimant, 42 U.S.C. §406(b). In this case, the Commissioner withheld 25 percent of past due benefits. Plaintiff's counsel’s request therefore represents approval of attorney fees of $17,630.91 of total retroactive benefits, after refund of an EAJA payment of $5,125.50 for child support. Under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 122 S. Ct. 1817 (2002), it is the duty of the Court to determine a reasonable fee.

The Court, in Culbertson v. Berryhill,586 U.S. 304, 139 S. Ct. 517(2019), has endorsed the: use of a contingency contract between the parties to allow up to a 25% fee of azgregate benefits for representation in Federal Court, providing that such afee is reasonable. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's counse] be awarded fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of 1% b00 , WF

This the i day of September , 2021.

TERRENCE W. BOYLE j

United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.