Santiago v. United States

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Santiago v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:17-cv-00182-KDB (5:16-cr-00008-KDB-DSC-6)

JERIMY JAMES SANTIAGO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence. [Doc. 1]. On April 14, 2016, Petitioner Jerimy James Santiago (“Petitioner”) pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 841

(a)(1) and 846. [Criminal Case No. 5:16-cr-00008-KDB-DSC (“CR”), Doc. 94: Acceptance and Entry of Guilty Plea; CR Doc. 178: Judgment]. Petitioner was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 60 months. [CR Doc. 178 at 2]. On October 10, 2017, Petitioner filed the instant petition seeking relief from his sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

. [See Doc. 1]. In his motion, Petitioner raised two grounds for relief, but indicated that he would file a brief with supporting facts when ordered to do so by the Court. [Id. at 4]. The next day, the Court ordered Petitioner to file such brief within 21 days of the Court’s Order. The Court advised Petitioner that if he did not submit a brief, his motion would be reviewed in its current form. [Doc. 2 at 1]. Petitioner has not filed a brief. On May 15, 2020, Petitioner was released from custody. The Court will, therefore, dismiss the petition as moot. Petitioner’s claim, brought in 2017, that he is entitled to sentencing relief no longer presents a live case or controversy for this Court’s review. See U.S. Const. Art. I, § 2; Arizonians for Official English v. Arizona,

520 U.S. 43, 67

(1997) (“To qualify as a case fit for federal-court adjudication, an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). As such, because Petitioner’s claim for sentencing relief is moot, the Court will deny his petition and dismiss this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Petitioners Motion Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [Doc. 1] is DENIED as moot and DISMISSED. 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to terminate this action. Signed: January 28, 2021

Kenneth D. Bell Cy, United States District Judge i f

Reference

Status
Unknown