District Court, W.D. North Carolina, 2021

Morgan v. United States

Morgan v. United States
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Decided February 17, 2021
Morgan v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:16-cv-357-RJC (3:06-cr-176-RJC-1) ANTOINE RYAN MORGAN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________________ ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Hold Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate in Abeyance, (Doc. No. 11).

Petitioner filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 raising a Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015) challenge to his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). (Doc. No. 1). The Court stayed this matter pending the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ consideration of United States v. Ali, No. 15-4433 and United States v. Simms, No. 15-4640. (Doc. No. 4). The Court then lifted the stay pursuant to United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019). (Doc. No. 5). However, the case was subsequently stayed pursuant to United States v. Taylor, 19-7616. (Doc. Nos. 7, 10).

The Government now asks the Court to stay the case pending the filing of a petition for certiorari in Taylor,1 the United States’ acquiescence in a defendant-filed petition that presents the same issue, or the decision of the Acting Solicitor General not to file a petition for certiorari – whichever occurs first. Counsel for Petitioner does not oppose the stay. (Doc. No. 11 at 3).

1 An extended 150-day deadline applies to a filing of a certiorari petition due to COVID-19.

The Court finds that a stay of these proceedings is in the interest of justice and judicial economy. The Government shall promptly notify the Court of the United States’ filing of a petition for certiorari in Taylor, the United States’ acquiescence in a defendant-filed petition that presents the same issue, or the Acting Solicitor General’s decision not to file a petition for certiorari, whichever occurs first.”

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Government’s Motion to Hold Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate in Abeyance, (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED.

2. The Government shall promptly notify the Court of the United States’ filing of a petition for certiorari in Taylor, the United States’ acquiescence in a defendant-filed petition that presents the same issue, or the Acting Solicitor General’s decision not to file a petition for certiorari, whichever occurs first.

Signed: February 17, 2021 Come Of Robert J. Conrad, Jr. ee United States District Judge “ee The Government has indicated that it will either move to hold the case in abeyance pending a Supreme Court determination on a relevant petition, or file a response to the Motion to Vacate at that time. (Doc. No. 11 at 3).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.