Pickard v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00150-FDW-DSC MATTHEW PRESTON PICKARD, Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and Defendant’s Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 10) to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Commissioner wishes to conduct further fact finding, including holding a new hearing. Plaintiff's counsel consents to the Government’s Motion for Remand.
The Court finds good cause has been alleged for remand and that further administrative fact-finding is warranted. Accordingly, the Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings, including a new hearing. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: February 22, 2021 Frank D. Whitney é United States District Judge Ags
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.