Riddle v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-00145-KDB THOMAS RIDDLE, Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant’s unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to Defendant for further administrative action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 29, 2021 | he Leute : fag” Kenneth D. Bell Vy, United States District Judge i f
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.