Bidou v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:20-cv-163 JENNIFER BIDOU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ORDER ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 15), and on Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner, (Doc. No. 17). Plaintiff, through counsel, consents to Defendant's Motion for Remand to the Commissioner.
For good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
To this extent, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 15), shall terminated as MOOT, and Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner, (Doc. No. 17), is GRANTED.
Signed: April 28, 2021 errors Max O. Cogburn ifs 2) United States District Judge Tote t
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.