Florence v. Saul

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Florence v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:20-CV-463-DCK SHAWNA FLORENCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant’s “Consent Motion For Remand” (Document No. 16) filed June 17, 2021. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant the motion. Noting Plaintiffs consent, the undersigned will remand this action for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). See Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

501 U.S. 89

(1991); Shalala v. Schaefer,

509 U.S. 292

(1993). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s “Consent Motion For Remand” (Document No. 16) is GRANTED.

Signed: June 18, 2021

David C. Keesler te United States Magistrate Judge et

Reference

Status
Unknown