Higgins v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION MICHAEL HIGGINS, )
Plaintiff, Vv. Civ. No. 1:20-CV-264-DSC ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, )
Defendant.
ORDER Defendant, Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, has moved this Court, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment reversing his decision with a remand of the case for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff, through counsel, consents to Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED. Signed: July 5, 2021 fr AC ey
David S. Cayer : United States Magistrate Judge ae
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.