Higgins v. Saul
Higgins v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION MICHAEL HIGGINS, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Civ. No. 1:20-CV-264-DSC ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant.
ORDER Defendant, Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, has moved this Court, pursuant to sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment reversing his decision with a remand of the case for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff, through counsel, consents to Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,
501 U.S. 89(1991). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Signed: July 5, 2021
fr AC ey David S. Cayer : United States Magistrate Judge ae
Reference
- Status
- Unknown