District Court, W.D. North Carolina, 2021

Sturgis v. Saul

Sturgis v. Saul
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Decided July 9, 2021
Sturgis v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION

SHANNON STURGIS,

Plaintiff, NO. 3:20-CV-00273-RJC-DSC VS.

ANDREW SAUL,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“EAJA”) and Costs filed on July 8, 2021. Having reviewed the Motion, supporting materials, memorandum in support, and the case file the Court determines that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees under the EAJA in the amount of $7,000.00.

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,000.00, and that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be paid $421.15 in costs from the Judgment Fund by the United States Department of the Treasury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(1).

SO ORDERED.

Signed: July 9, 2021 ir AC ey

David S. Cayer 2 -f United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.