Johnson v. Cuomo
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:21-cv-205-MOC-DCK
CONSTANCE L. JOHNSON, ) )
Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER
ANDREW CUOMO, et al., ) )
Defendants. ) ____________________________________ )
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on May 4, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file an Application to proceed in forma pauperis. On May 5, 2021, the Court entered a Notice of Deficiency requiring the Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file an amended Application within 21 days. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff was cautioned that the failure to timely comply with the Order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Id. at 1).
Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed an amended Application and the time to do so has now expired. Therefore, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 631- (1962) (although Rule 41(b) does not expressly provide for sua sponte dismissal, a district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case for lack of prosecution or violation of a court order). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the Court’s May 5, 2021 Notice of Deficiency.
2. The Clerk of this Court is directed to close this case.
Signed: July 27, 2021
Kee BLAND Lee
Max O. Cogburn Jr
United States District Judge Felgen
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.