Danner v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
TABITHA DANNER, ) )
Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 1:21-00042-DSC ) v. ) )
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, )
Acting Commissioner of )
Social Security, ) )
Defendant. )
ORDER
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant’s Motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this case for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). The Clerk of Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 27, 2021
David S. Cayer : i-f
United States Magistrate Judge ae
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.