Furr v. Saul

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 5:20-cv-00201-MR

MARK FURR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER OF REMAND ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Remand. [Doc. 13].

Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” The Defendant here has moved for reversal of the decision below and for a remand of this case for further administrative proceedings.

For the reasons stated in the Defendant’s motion, and in light of the Plaintiff’s consent, the Court finds that remand is appropriate. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Remand [Doc. 13] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby REVERSED, and this case is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings, consistent with this Order.

The Clerk of Court shall enter a separate Judgment of Remand simultaneously herewith, thereby closing the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: November 18, 2021 Martifi Reidinger ey Chief United States District Judge Ale