Whitfield v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION KENNETH WHITFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil No. 1:20-CV-00245 v. ) ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) and filed on October 7, 2021. (Doc.
No. 20). Having reviewed the motion and supporting memorandum, and in light of Defendant’s consent to the amount of fees, the Court grants the motion and determines that Plaintiff should be awarded an attorney’s fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $9,500.00.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney fees in the amount of $9,500.00, and that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiffs counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: November 16, 2021 Frank D. Whitney é United States District Judge tg i
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.