Haseloff v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 1:21-cv-00072-MOC
PETER HASELOFF, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) ORDER
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
Defendant. )
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14) and Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration (Doc. No. 16). Defendant represents that Plaintiff has consented to the Motion to Remand through counsel. (Id.).
The Court finds good cause to reverse the Acting Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Acting Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED. To this extent, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14) is DISMISSED as moot.
Signed: December 7, 2021
Bkievter SS Max O. Cogburn Jr LIJnited States District Tiidoe "ok ga hf
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.