: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:22-CV-84-D

EMPRESS RAYONNA EUKEYA EL, ) Plaintiff, ; V. ORDER FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, CIRCUIT COURT VANCE COUNTY, ) Defendant.

On April 1, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [D.E. 4]. Pursuant to

(b)(1), the court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. for memorandum and recommendation on the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for a frivolity review [D.E. 9]. On April 25, 2022, Magistrate Judge Jones issued a Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) and recommended that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice as

_ frivolous. See IDE. 11]. “The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to make a de novo determination of those portions of the magistrate judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005) (cleaned up); see

(b). Absent a timely objection, “a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond,

(quotation omitted). If a party makes only general obj ections, de novo review is not required. See Wells v. Shriners Hosp.,

(4th Cir. 1997). In “order to preserve for appeal an issue in a

magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to alert the district court of the true ground for the objection.” Martin v. Duffy,

(4th Cir. 2017) (quotation omitted); see United States v. □

Midgette,

(4th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff did not object to the M&R. Therefore, the court reviews for clear error. The court has reviewed the M&R and the record. There is no clear error on the face of the record. See Diamond,

. In sum, the court has reviewed the record and ADOPTS the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. ©

11], and GRANTS plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [D.E. 4]. The court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE plaintiffs complaint as frivolous. The clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. This tT day of May, 2022.

4b eJeA J S C. DEVER If United States District Judge □