Hoxit v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION LESLIE HOXIT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 1:21-00001-GCM ) v. ) ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, _) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant’s motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this case for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED._ January 10, 2022 Labal Ihe Graham C. Mullen United States District Judge gt
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.