Duncan v. Saul

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Duncan v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:21-cv-38 WILLIAM DUNCAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant.

Defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security, has moved this Court, pursuant to sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g), to enter a judgment reversing her decision and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 17). Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant’s Motion for Remand. The motion is GRANTED. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g) is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Melkonyan v.Sullivan,

501 U.S. 89

(1991). To this extent, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 15), is DISMISSED as moot.

Signed: January 24, 2022

Korine. Max O. Cogburn i ) United States District Judge Tote t

Reference

Status
Unknown