Hilton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Hilton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION No. 1:21-CV-300-DSC
BROOKE HILTON, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER FOR REMAND ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) ) Acting Commissioner of ) Social Security ) ) Defendant. ) ) ______________________________)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Complaint and Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Commissioner wishes to conduct further fact finding, including holding a new administrative hearing. The Court finds good cause has been alleged for remand and that further administrative fact-finding is warranted. Accordingly, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings, including a new hearing. See Shalala v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292(1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan,
501 U.S. 89(1991). 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Signed: April 14, 2022
David S. Cayer ia-f United States Magistrate Judge aE
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown