Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:22-cv-213-GCM
STACY A. ROGERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1), and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. No. 2). In this matter, Plaintiff seeks the review of an adverse final determination of the Social Security Commission. See (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has filed an Application to proceed in forma pauperis which is pending before the Court. (Doc. No. 2). Proper venue under the Social Security Act is “in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides, or has his principal place of business….”
42 U.S.C. § 405(g). When a plaintiff files a case laying venue in the wrong division or district, the district “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); see also
28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (“For the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented.”). Transfer for lack of venue can be considered sua sponte. See Feller v. Brock,
802 F.2d 722, 729 n.7 (4th Cir. 1986). 1 Plaintiff resides in Cabarrus County, which is in the Middle District of North Carolina, and it appears that venue does not lie in this District. Because it appears that this action should have been brought in the Middle District of North Carolina where the Plaintiff resides, this action will be transferred to the Middle District. Plaintiff may file a Notice objecting to the transfer within fourteen (14) days of this Order. The failure to object will result in this case’s transfer to the Middle District of North Carolina without further notice. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a Notice within fourteen (14) days of this order objecting to the transfer of this action to the Middle District of North Carolina. If no Response is filed, this action will be transferred to the Middle District without further notice.
Signed: May 16, 2022 Laban! Leubhe— Graham C. Mullen ey United States District Judge ge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown