Rogers v. Harnett County

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Rogers v. Harnett County

Trial Court Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:22-CV-00208-BO-RN

KALEIGHIA ROGERS & ) SONDRA BRUTON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) V. ) ORDER ) HARNETT COUNTY, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

This matter is before the Court on the memorandum and recommendation (M&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, IT. The M&R recommends dismissal of plaintiffs federal claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It also recommends the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state claims. Plaintiff has failed to object to the M&R, and the time for doing so has expired. When a party fails to file a timely objection, the Court “must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond y. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

416 F.3d 310, 315

(4th Cir. 2005) (quotations omitted). The Court is satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record and ADOPTS the M&R [DE 7]. The complaint [DE 1] is DISMISSED, and the motions to proceed in forma pauperis [DE 1, 2] are DISMISSED as moot. The clerk is DIRECTED to close the case.

SO ORDERED, this { ? day of February, 2023. VeeccugZ 7, Poe TERRENCE W. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown