IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION Case No. 4:22-cv-00025-M KATHERINE ELIZABETH FREEMAN, Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment in their favor [DE 14, 15]. Pursuant to

(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), United States Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers entered a memorandum and recommendation (““M&R”), recommending that the court allow Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [DE 14]; deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 15]; and remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. DE 17. To date, no objections have been filed. A magistrate judge’s recommendation carries no presumptive weight. The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the... recommendation |... receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”

(b)(1); accord Mathews v. Weber,

(1976). The court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Jd. § 636(b)(1). Absent a specific and timely objection, the court reviews only for “clear error” and need not give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Diamond y. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005).

Upon careful review of the M&R and the record presented, and finding no clear error, the court ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own. For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [DE 14] is ALLOWED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 15] is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED this aK day of March, 2023.

— “ed wee RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE