Graham v. Trustee Service of Carolina PLLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Graham v. Trustee Service of Carolina PLLC

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:22-CV-00454-M TREVOR G. GRAHAM & ANN ) GRAHAM, ) - ) Plaintiffs, □□ ) ORDER V. ) □ □ ) TRUSTEE SERVICE OF CAROLINA, ) . PLLC, et al., _ ) ) Defendants. ) a) . □ Before the court are four motions: two motions filed by the Plaintiffs asking the court to enter default judgment against Defendants [DE 18, DE 44], one motion filed by Defendant Trustee Services of Carolina asking the court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint [DE 21], and one motion filed by Defendant Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing asking the court to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint [DE 23]. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers II entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”), recommending the court dismiss the case in its entirety. DE 55. Judge Numbers ‘recommended the court deny Plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment [DE 18, DE 44] and grant . Defendants’ motions to dismiss [DE 21 and DE 23]. To date, no objections have been filed.! □ A magistrate judge’s recommendation carries no presumptive weight. The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the... recommendation ] . . . receive further evidence

! Judge Numbers issued the M&R on May 8, 2023. Objections were due to be filed on or before May 25, 2023. See DE 55. The parties’ motions and M&R were submitted to this court for disposition on June 8, 2023.

or recommit the oe the magistrate judge with instructions.” 28 USC. § 636(b)(1). The court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. § 636(b)(1). Absent a specific □

_ timely objection, the court reviews only for “clear error” and need not give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co.,

416 F.3d 310

, 315: (4th Cir. 2005). Upon careful review of the M&R [DE 55] and the record presented, and finding. no clear error, the court ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own. For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment [DE 18, DE 44] are DENIED, and Defendants’ motions to dismiss [DE 21 and DE 23] are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. tf SO ORDERED this % day of June, 2023.

i LEM sue F ap fr MMS a RICHARD E. MYERS II . CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/9

Reference

Status
Unknown