United States v. $9,393.00 in U.S. Currency

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

United States v. $9,393.00 in U.S. Currency

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:20-cv-00053-MR-WCM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER AND DEFAULT ) JUDGMENT OF ) FORFEITURE APPROXIMATELY $9,393.00 IN U.S. ) CURRENCY seized from Blade ) Frierson on September 26, 2019 in ) Buncombe County, North Carolina, ) ) APPROXIMATELY $24,484.00 IN U.S. ) CURRENCY seized from Blade ) Frierson on September 26, 2019 in ) Buncombe County, North Carolina, ) ) and ) ) ONE 2019 TOYOTA TUNDRA ) CREWMAX TRUCK, VIN ) 5TFHY5F16KX809215, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before on the Government’s Motion for Default Judgment. [Doc. 32]. The Government moves for the entry of a default judgment as to all persons and entities with respect to the $9,393.00 in U.S. Currency, the $24,484.00 in U.S. Currency, and the 2019 Toyota Tundra (collectively, “the Defendant Property”) identified in the Verified Complaint, other than Blade

Frierson, whose claim has been resolved pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement. [See Doc. 29-1 Settlement Agreement]. On February 18, 2020, the Government filed a Verified Complaint for

Forfeiture in Rem, alleging that the Defendant Property is subject to civil forfeiture under

21 U.S.C. §§ 881

(a)(4) and (6). [Doc. 1]. On February 19, 2020, the Clerk issued a Warrant of Arrest in Rem for the Defendant Property. [Doc. 2].

After the Government filed its Complaint, and in accordance with Rule G(4)(b) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the Government provided direct notice of this action

to known potential claimants. In particular, on February 21, 2020, the Government mailed notice and a copy of the Complaint to Blade Christian Frierson and his attorney, Ben Scales. Additionally, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4)(a), the Government provided notice by publication

as to all persons with potential claims to the Defendant Property by publishing notice via www.forfeiture.gov for 30 consecutive days, beginning on February 21, 2020. [Doc. 3].

2 The Government has taken reasonable steps to provide notice to known potential claimants, and the Government has otherwise complied with

the notice requirements set forth in Supplemental Rule G(4). During the pendency of this action, no other individual or entity has made a timely claim to the Defendant Property. Accordingly, on February 15, 2023, the

Government filed a motion for entry of default, [Doc. 29], and on February 23, 2023, the Clerk entered default. [Doc. 31]. For these reasons, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b), the Government requests that the Court enter a default judgment as to all persons and entities

with respect to the Defendant Property other than Blade Frierson, whose claim has been resolved pursuant to a settlement agreement. See United States v. 15 Trimont Lake Road, No. 2:10-cv-16,

2011 WL 309921

(W.D.N.C.

Jan. 28, 2011) (entering Default Judgment of Forfeiture as to all other persons and entities when a claimant entered into settlement agreement). After careful review, the Court finds that the Government’s motion should be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. The Government’s Motion for Default Judgment of Forfeiture [Doc. 32] is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of the United States

3 against all persons and entities with respect to the Defendant Property other than Blade Frierson, whose claim to the Defendant Property was resolved pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement. 2. | With the exception of the vehicle and amount to be returned to Mr. Frierson under the terms of the settlement agreement, any right, title and interest of all other persons and entities to the Defendant Property is hereby forfeited to the United States, and no other right, title, or interest shall exist. 3. The United States Marshal is hereby directed to dispose of the Defendant Property as provided by law, consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: March 6, 2023

Martifi Reidinger ey Chief United States District Judge Ale

Reference

Status
Unknown