Vanhassel v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Vanhassel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:22-cv-00233-WCM

RAINER VANHASSEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) v. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ )

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(the “Motion,” Doc. 21). Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), a court must award attorney’s fees to a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action against the United States unless the court finds that the Government’s position was “substantially justified” or that “special circumstances” would make such an award unjust.

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d)(1)(A). Because the Court ordered that this case be remanded to the Social Security Administration, Plaintiff is properly considered a “prevailing party” in this action. See Shalala v. Schaefer,

509 U.S. 292, 302

,

113 S.Ct. 2625, 2635

,

125 L.Ed.2d 239

(1993); Docs. 19 & 20. An award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA must be “reasonable.”

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(b). It is within the court’s discretion to award attorney’s fees above the statutory hourly rate. See Payne v. Sullivan,

977 F.2d 900, 903

(4th Cir. 1992).

The Motion indicates that Plaintiff seeks $5,000.00 in fees. Doc. 16. Plaintiff represents that the Commissioner consents to the Motion, and that counsel have settled upon the amount sought for 23.25 hours of “attorney work performed.” Doc. 21 at 1. Plaintiff’s counsel has also submitted a summary of

time spent on this civil action. Doc. 21-1. After review and consideration of the Motion, the supporting documents, and applicable authorities, the Court will allow the Motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(Doc. 21) is GRANTED and Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,000.00. (“Fee Award”).

(2) As EAJA fees belong to the litigant and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, see Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586, 589

(2010), the Fee Award shall be paid by Defendant as follows: a. If Plaintiff has federal debt registered with the

Department of the Treasury that may be offset by the Fee Award, such amount of the Fee Award as is necessary to satisfy Plaintiff’s federal debt shall be so used, up to and including the entire amount of the Fee Award. b. The remaining balance of the Fee Award after application of the offset, if any, described above shall be delivered by Defendant to Plaintiff's counsel on behalf of Plaintiff.

Signed: June 12, 2023 oJ ao ¢

W. Carleton Metcalf / ey, United States Magistrate Judge alls □

Reference

Status
Unknown