Morgan v. Haydon
Morgan v. Haydon
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:23-cv-00686-M-KS
KYLE MORGAN, ) Plaintiff, ORDER KENNETH W. HAYDON, Defendant. ) a) This matter comes before the court on the Plaintiff's application, filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915, to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP’’). [DE 5]. Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”), recommending that the court deny the application and direct Plaintiff to pay the requisite filing fee. DE 6. Judge Swank also advised that any objections to her recommendation must be filed on or before December 18, 2023. To date, no objections have been filed.' A magistrate judge’s recommendation carries no presumptive weight. The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the... recommendation[ ]. .. receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); accord Mathews v. Weber,
423 U.S. 261, 271(1976). The court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection
' Judge Swank issued the M&R on December 4, 2023. See DE 54. The Plaintiffs application and the M&R were submitted to this court for disposition on December 28, 2023.
is made.” Jd. § 636(b)(1). Absent a specific and timely objection, the court reviews only for “clear error” and need not give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co.,
416 F.3d 310, 315(4th Cir. 2005). Upon careful review of the M&R and the record presented, and finding no clear error, the court ADOPTS as its own the recommendation of the magistrate judge. For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP in this case [DE 5] is DENIED. The case docket reflects that the Plaintiff paid the requisite filing fee on December 6, 2023; accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall issue the requested summons and the action shall proceed in the usual order.
ORDERED this 2 J day of January, 2024.
“el (Y] ys RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown