IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:24-CV-444-D

KATHY R. ALLEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) L3/HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )

The court DENIES as baseless plaintiff's motion for recusal [D.E. 36]. See, e.g., Liteky v. United States,

(1994); Belue v. Leventhal,

(4th Cir. 2011); Bartko _v. Wheeler, No. 5:14-CT-3043,

, at *6 (E.D.N.C. July 18, 2014) (unpublished). Likewise, the court DENIES as baseless plaintiff's “emergency” motion under Rule 52 and 59 [D.E. 39]. SO ORDERED. This 44 day of April, 2025. Anas C. DEVER Il United States District Judge