IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

No. 5:25-CV-212-FL

SHAQUAN LAVENA LESANE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WAKE COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ) ORDER ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, ERICA ) FRAISER, in her individual and official ) capacities, JULIE BELL, in her individual ) and official capacities, and JIM BLACK, in ) her individual and official capacities, ) ) Defendants. )

This matter is before the court for review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint (DE 1) pursuant to

(e). Also pending is plaintiff’s motion for emergency temporary restraining order. (DE 3). United States Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers, entered memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”), pursuant to

(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), wherein it is recommended plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed. (DE 6). Plaintiff did not file objections to the M&R, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. Upon a careful review of the M&R, the court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”

(b)(1). Because no objections have been filed, the court reviews the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions only for clear error, and need not give any explanation for adopting the M&R. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005); Camby v. Davis,

(4th Cir. 1983). The magistrate judge recommends dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims on multiple grounds, including lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Upon careful review of the M&R, the court finds the magistrate judge’s analysis to be thorough, and there is no clear error. The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own, and plaintiffs action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to

(e)(2)(B) lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (DE 3) necessarily is TERMINATED. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to close the case. SO ORDERED, this the 3rd day of December, 2025.

United States District Judge