Keith Chan v. Joy F. Campanelli, ET AL.
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA KEITH CHAN, Plaintiff, v. 1:25-CV-1042-DAB-LPA JOY F. CAMPANELLI, ET AL., Defendant.
ORDER This matter is before the Court for review of the Order and Recommendation filed on January 21, 2026. 11/21/26 Text Recommendation; 11/21/26 Text Order. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Id. The deadline for objections passed on February 9, 2026, and no parties have objected to the Recommendation.
Because there are no objections, the Court “must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’”
Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 72 advisory committee’s note). This Court has accordingly reviewed the Recommendation and concludes it contains no clear error.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, 1/21/26 Recommendation, is adopted and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
This the 3rd day of March, 2026.
/s/ David A. Bragdon United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.