North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1995

Taylor v. N.C.D.O.C.

Taylor v. N.C.D.O.C.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided September 11, 1995 · ORDER BY DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pro se . Defendant: The Honorable Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; William H. Borden, Assistant Attorney General, Counsel of Record. * * * * * * * * * * *

Taylor v. N.C.D.O.C.

Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Shuping. The plaintiff has not shown good ground to make additional findings of fact, reconsider the evidence, or reconsider the Decision and Order in this case.

Plaintiff's motion for additional findings of fact and motion for reconsideration is, and the same shall be, hereby DENIED.

S/ _______________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ _______________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/ _______________________ COY M. VANCE COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.