North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1995

Hincemon v. Monroe Ice and Fuel

Hincemon v. Monroe Ice and Fuel
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided May 23, 1995 · AMENDED OPINION AND AWARD FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY COY M. VANCE COMMISSIONER

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Bailey, Patterson, Cadell, Hart Bailey, P.A., Charlotte, N.C.; Martha L. Ramsay appearing. Defendants: Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, L.L.P., Raleigh, N.C.; William J. Garrity appearing. * * * * * * * * * * *

Hincemon v. Monroe Ice and Fuel

Opinion of the Court

For good cause shown, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Opinion and Award for the Full Commission filed May 9, 1995 in the above-captioned case is hereby AMENDED as follows:

1. Paragraph #6 of the Conclusions of Law shall be stricken and the following paragraph shall be substituted in its place:

"Plaintiff's average weekly wage is $383.83, yielding a compensation rate of $256.01."

2. Paragraph #1 of the Award shall be modified by striking the first sentence of said paragraph and substituting the following sentence in its place:

"Defendants shall pay compensation to the plaintiff, on account of his temporary total disability at the rate of $256.01 per week during the periods of 1 May 1993 through 11 May 1993 and 15 July 1993 through 4 October 1993."

In all other respects, the Opinion and Award as previously filed herein remains in full force and effect.

S/ __________________ COY M. VANCE COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ __________________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN

S/ __________________ DOUGLAS E. BERGER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

CMV/cnp/tmd 5/18/95

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.