North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1995

Alston v. Family Dollar Stores

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided January 30, 1995 · ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Alexander, Ralston, Speckhard Speckhard, Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina; Stanley E. Speckhard, Counsel of Record. Defendant: Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge Rice, Attorneys, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; James P. Hutcherson, Counsel of Record. * * * * * * * * * * * *

Opinion of the Court

Counsel for plaintiff moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that both parties by letter dated 6 December 1994 to the Commission stipulated to a 30 day extension of time to file briefs. As a result of this extension of time, the plaintiff-appellee's brief will not be due until after the 3 March 1995 Full Commission hearing date. Defendants have no objection to a continuance.

Upon plaintiff's motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff's motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED.

S/ ________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.