North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1997

Dingle v. N.C. Department of Transportation

Dingle v. N.C. Department of Transportation
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided April 25, 1997 · DECISION AND ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY BERNADINE S. BALLANCE, COMMISSIONER

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pro se. Defendants: The Honorable Michael F. Easley, Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC; Don Wright of Record. * * * * * * * * * *

Dingle v. N.C. Department of Transportation

Opinion of the Court

Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Order of Dismissal of the Deputy Commissioner as follows:

Counsel for defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's tort claim. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss alleges in part that plaintiff was working at the time of injury through a N.C. Department of Correction work assignment and that the Workers' Compensation Act is the exclusive remedy for prisoners who are injured while working, based upon the North Carolina Supreme Court's ruling in Richardson v. N.C. Department of Correction,345 N.C. 128, 478 S.E.2d 501 (1996).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

Each side shall bear its own costs.

S/ ________________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ _____________________ LAURA K. MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

S/ _____________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

BSB:md

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.