North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2000

Kirk v. Great American Ins.

Kirk v. Great American Ins.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided November 20, 2000 · <center> ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY CHRISTOPHER SCOTT, COMMISSIONER.</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: The Law Offices of George W. Lennon, Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, George W. Lennon, Counsel of Record. Defendant: Teague, Campbell, Dennis Gorham, Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, Thomas M. Clare, Counsel of Record. ***********

Kirk v. Great American Ins.

Opinion of the Court

In reviewing plaintiffs motion, the Full Commission notes that contrary to plaintiffs contention, the ten percent (10%) penalty provision of G.S. 97-18(g) is not mandatory, as shown by the language ". . . unless such nonpayment is excused by the Commission . . . G.S. 97-18(g). Plaintiff is correct, however, regarding the mandatory nature of the interest provisions in G.S. 97-86.2. Furthermore, interest owed under this provision that is overdue may be subject to the penalty provision in G.S. 97-18(g).

At present, there is insufficient evidence or relevant documentation upon which to find that any payments of compensation or interest pursuant to G.S. 97-86.2 are overdue and therefore subject to the penalty provisions of G.S. 97-18(g). Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion is hereby DENIED.

No additional costs are assessed.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ RENÉE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.