North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2000

Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center

Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided September 15, 2000 · <center> ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY CHRISTOPHER SCOTT, COMMISSIONER.</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: The Twifford Law Firm, Attorneys, Elizabeth City, N.C.; Branch W. Vincent, III, Counsel of Record. Defendants: Brooks, Stevens Pope, Attorneys, Cary, N.C.; Michael C. Sigmon, Counsel of Record. ***********

Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center

Opinion of the Court

The decision filed by the North Carolina Supreme Court established that plaintiff in this matter does not enjoy a presumption of total disability, but rather has a presumption of partial disability. The Court also held that it was plaintiffs burden to rebut this presumption in moving forth with a claim for total disability. Finally, the Court noted that, should this arise, defendants would have the burden of rebutting the presumption of plaintiffs continued partial disability.

Given the issues raised by the Supreme Court and in accordance with its mandate, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit supplemental briefs on the current issues before the Full Commission within THRITY DAYS (30) of receipt of this Order.

No additional costs are assessed at this time.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.