North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2001

Chatham v. Trim Systems

Chatham v. Trim Systems
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided May 2, 2001 · <center> ORDER for the Full Commission by LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC, Commissioner.</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pressly Thomas Conley, attorneys, Statesville, North Carolina; Ed Pressly, Counsel of Record. Defendant: Orbock Bowden Ruark Dillard, attorneys, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Barbara Ruark, Counsel of Record. ***********

Chatham v. Trim Systems

Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed the Compromise Settlement Agreement and the reasonableness of the attorneys fee requested by plaintiffs attorney. Plaintiffs attorney has shown good grounds to reconsider the amount of the fee. The undersigned find plaintiffs attorneys fee in the amount of thirty-three and one-third percent reasonable in view of the nature of the case, the time expended, and the customary fee allowed by the Commission.

Therefore, the portion of Deputy Commissioner Stephensons Order allowing a fee in the amount of twenty-five percent is hereby VACATED and it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs attorney shall receive a fee in the amount of thirty-three and one-third percent of the proceeds of the Compromise Settlement Agreement to be deducted from the lump sum and paid directly to plaintiffs attorney. All other portions of the Order filed December 20, 2000 shall remain in full force and effect.

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.