North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2001

Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided December 17, 2001 · <center> ORDER for the Full Commission by DIANNE C. SELLERS, Commissioner.</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pro se . Defendant: The Honorable Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina; Richard J. Votta, Counsel of Record. ***********

Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed this matter including the briefs of the parties and the prior Order of Commissioner Ballance. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider or amend the Order. Therefore, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the prior Order of Commissioner Balance and enters the following Order.

Plaintiff's claim was not timely filed and is therefore barred by the Statute of Limitations. Moreover, even if plaintiff's claim were timely filed, plaintiff has not stated a claim for negligence. Therefore, defendant's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED.

This the ___ day of December 2001.

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.