North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2002

Lee v. Roses

Lee v. Roses
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided July 25, 2002 · <center> ORDER for the Full Commission by CHRISTOPHER SCOTT, Commissioner</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pam Hunter appearing; Charlotte, North Carolina. Defendants: Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog; Raleigh, North Carolina; Nicole Viele, appearing

Lee v. Roses

Opinion of the Court

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman and the briefs and arguments on appeal. Having reconsidered the material in the file, the Full Commission affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding that plaintiff failed to prosecute this case in a timely manner. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, PLAINTIFF SHALL PAY defendant's counsel a reasonable attorney's fee of $500.00 pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-88.1.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/____________________ THOMAS JEFFERSON BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.